THE top performing pupils in every secondary school in Scotland should be given automatic access to university regardless of their exam results, an education leader has claimed.
Gordon Watson, president of the UCU Scotland lecturers' union, said yesterday the drastic measure was required to widen access to higher education to pupils from poorer backgrounds.
His comments came after numerous studies showed social background is the most important factor in determining whether a young person achieves academically at school.
Access to university is tightly controlled, with pupils given priority depending on their exam results, although other factors are sometimes taken into consideration. Because some schools in deprived areas such as Glasgow have no pupils achieving five or more Highers in some years, they often send no pupils to university.
Michael Russell, the Education Secretary, has suggested giving universities targets on access in future, with fines if they fail.
However, Mr Watson told the UCU Scotland annual congress in Edinburgh more drastic action was required.
"We need to look at more initiatives to get the lowest performing schools to send more students to our universities. That would not adversely affect the top performing schools, while having a positive impact on the lowest performing schools," he said.
"The top pupils in every school should get access to the university system irrespective of the ability of the school or their exam grades.
"Top schools can bring pupils' grades up while poorer schools can bring them down because they don't necessarily concentrate on their top pupils.
"It would only involve a small amount of pupils, but it would have a huge impact by changing the culture in those schools and giving opportunities to talented pupils who would otherwise miss out."
The suggestion was welcomed by Robin Parker, president of NUS Scotland. He said: "There are parts of America that have done this on a limited scale and it has made inroads. Now is a critical time to get more students from different backgrounds into university and this is one of the ways of doing that.
"What would also be important is to make more places available to universities so these students would be additional and would not displace others."
Mr Russell told the meeting he had warned university principals about the danger to their reputation of using significant increases in public funding on boosting their own salaries.
The move follows dramatic increases in the salaries of principals, who can now earn upwards of £250,000, although recent increases have been more modest.
"Almost everyone who looks at this issue says restraint is required across the public sector and I have said to university principals that restraint applies to them," he said.
"University principals know this is a matter of some public concern and I am sure university principals will want to show that the increase in public funding they have received has been well spent. Members of the public will expect salaries to be in line with national norms and not in places where people will raise their eyebrows."
Later, the congress backed a motion to have principals pay capped.
Congress also supported a motion seeking to combat allegations of increased bullying in higher education.
The motion says particular concerns have been raised over staff being bullied into taking voluntary redundancy. The motion also highlights a general climate of bullying, with universities increasingly run by managers with little experience of academic life.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article