NEARLY one third of secondary pupils have accessed unsuitable material on websites using school computers, according to a new survey.
The poll of 1,000 young people between the ages of 11 and 16 across the UK found 29 per cent of pupils had viewed violent or abusive internet sites, with 18 per cent saying they had accessed adult material.
Only 32 per cent of pupils said the school's computer security system had blocked them from accessing unsuitable websites. The survey also found that 44 per cent said internet speeds at home were much faster than at school and that delays in accessing websites had slowed learning.
Pupils used computers most in information communications technology subjects as well as science and maths, while those studying art used them the least.
Nathan Marke, chief technology officer at technology and telecoms company Daisy Group, which conducted the survey, said: "Schools are investing in technology to improve the learning experience, but in many cases they don't have the correct infrastructure to support it.
"We also discovered that tools of yesteryear, such as blackboards and chalk, are remarkably prominent, perhaps because they are still seen as a fool-proof and reliable alternative to their technical successors."
The study also found that a third of those polled, which included 70 pupils in Scotland, said using the internet in lessons brought subjects to life and helped them learn.
Interactive whiteboards are the predominant teaching tool, with 56 per cent of children saying they were regularly used.
Despite the drive to introduce more handheld tablet computers into schools, children said they were more likely to use text books and a calculator than either a computer or mobile tablet device in lessons.
Mr Marke added: "Education procurement is a long-winded and complicated process which often means that schools stick with the systems they have, rather than shopping for better contracts and systems so teachers are left to work with out-of-date infrastructure."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article