People are dying from air "poisoned" by the aviation industry which has "consistently lied" about expanding Heathrow airport, the shadow chancellor has said.
John McDonnell addressed hundreds of people gathered in London's Parliament Square for a rally to oppose a third runway at the UK's largest airport.
The Labour MP, whose constituency contains Heathrow, said it would be "down to people power" to prevent the airport's expansion if it is backed by Parliament and court appeals against the decision fail.
He said: "In my constituency at the moment, people are literally dying. They're dying because the air has already been poisoned by the aviation industry.
"They've promised us after every inquiry, no further expansion. They are liars. They have consistently lied to us.
"They now tell us if they get a third runway, there'll be no increase in noise and no increase in pollution. They're liars. They lie every time to us."
Tory London mayoral candidate Zac Goldsmith and his Labour rival Sadiq Khan were also among those to address the rally after the Airports Commission recommended building a third Heathrow runway.
Heathrow was chosen by the commission as the best way to increase airport capacity for London and the South East because it was predicted it would add £147 billion in economic growth and 70,000 jobs by 2050.
Prime Minister David Cameron is due to announce a decision on expansion by the end of the year.
Mr McDonnell, the MP for Hayes and Harlington, said 4,000 homes would be "demolished or rendered unliveable" in his constituency if the third runway goes ahead.
"At one point they were going to drive a road through our cemetery and we were going to have to dig up our dead," he said.
"I say this to any politician who might be thinking of voting for the third runway - vote for the third runway and don't expect any votes from Londoners because we'll vote you out.
"If politicians vote for it and we can't win in the courts, it will be down to people power to prevent this going ahead. So I will welcome back to my constituency, climate camp and all those demonstrators that will take action to prevent this runway being built."
Mr Goldsmith said a "catastrophic price" will be paid if a third runway is built and expanding Heathrow would make London's' air pollution problems "unsolvable".
The MP for Richmond Park said: "We know a million homes, a million families, would be subjected to noise way beyond what is acceptable, according to the World Health Organisation.
"We know that our air pollution problems in London would be unsolvable if we expand Heathrow. And we know it requires the demolition of more than 1,000 homes.
"It is a catastrophic price to pay."
Mr Goldsmith added that the Airports Commission's report was "discredited", "bogus" and "hopeless".
Demonstrators gathered outside the Palace of Westminster chanted "no ifs, no buts, no third runway", in reference to Prime Minister David Cameron's comments in 2009, when he said: "The third runway at Heathrow is not going ahead, no ifs, no buts."
Mr Khan, the MP for Tooting, said: "The UK Supreme Court two months ago held that our air was in breach of the EU air quality directive.
"Our air is a killer. It makes you sick and it's illegal. In those circumstances how can we say yes to a new runway at Heathrow airport."
Organisers of the rally said London mayor Boris Johnson was due to speak at the event but he could no longer attend.
A spokesman for Mr Johnson said he was not attending because he had a personal commitment out of the country.
"He would be there otherwise," the spokesman said. "Boris's support remains undiminished. He wishes them well."
Mr Johnson, who steps down as mayor next year, had previously proposed a new airport should be built in the Thames estuary, but the plan dubbed "Boris Island" was dismissed by the commission.
A Heathrow spokesman said: "London's future success as a global city, and as a centre for finance and investment, will depend on the strength of links with existing and new markets.
"The Airports Commission has confirmed that Heathrow expansion will keep the capital and the whole of the UK at the heart of the global economy, meet environmental targets and balance the needs of local communities.
"That's why the majority of those living around the airport support the plan along with unions, businesses and politicians across the whole of the UK."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel