The amount of waste being sent to landfill or burned instead of being recycled has almost doubled in the past three years, figures show.
The contents of up to one in five recycling bins were turned away by some councils last year because they were "contaminated" with the wrong items, a Freedom of Information request for the Daily Mail revealed.
Last year 338,000 tonnes of recycling was buried or incinerated, the paper said, up 84% from 2012.
Twenty in every 100 bins were turned away in the London boroughs of Newham and Hammersmith and Fulham, the figures showed, while 18 in every 100 were rejected by Manchester City Council.
Contaminated recycling must be sent to landfill, Peter Box, environment spokesman for the Local Government Association told the paper.
He said while some people might make genuine mistakes when it came to their rubbish, action was needed against those who did so deliberately.
He said: "Allowing councils to identify and work with people who misunderstand or make mistakes when sorting their rubbish is important.
"As a last resort, councils also need effective, proportionate powers to take action against households or businesses which persistently or wilfully damage the local environment."
He added that the overall amount of waste produced must be reduced.
He said: "Boosting recycling is only addressing half the problem. Retailers, manufacturers and caterers must do more to bring down the waste generated each year."
Newham Council said it was working to cut down on the amount of recycling "lost because of contamination".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel