A WOMAN who claimed her neighbour’s 30ft trees had ruined her garden has claimed victory in a four-year battle to have them cut down.
Oonagh Waugh, 63, was locked in a war of words with neighbour Alexander Moreland over trees and ivy plants on his property.
Mrs Waugh claimed the garden of her home in Carnbroe, Lanarkshire, had been left in darkness by the "dominant and overbearing" trees.
After failing to reach agreement with Mr Moreland on having them reduced in size she resorted to High Hedge laws.
Officials from North Lanarkshire Council had backed her and ordered the trees be lopped in May.
But Mr Moreland had turned to the Scottish Government, claiming bats could be sheltering in the trees and asking for a delay to the works.
A government reporter has now allowed a temporary delay but insisted the trees should still be cut down to size.
Mr Moreland had written to the government outlining his opposition to the council’s order.
He said: “The notice outlines that there might be birds nesting within the trees. With the bird breeding season spanning march until August we do not feel we could proceed with the notice over his period without negatively impacting the ecology."
Government reporter Richard Hickman said: “While the tree has only a low level of suitability for bat roosting, as bats are a protected species it is essential that adequate safeguards are put in place.
“I conclude that this high hedge action should be retained, but a revised notice issued with a later date for compliance, and omitting the requirement for an experienced ecologist to check the trees for nesting birds as the breeding season will be over."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel