The High Court is to rule on whether Government plans to tackle air pollution are “unlawful”.
Environmental lawyers from ClientEarth launched a third legal challenge last month against proposals for reducing illegal levels of harmful nitrogen dioxide.
Mr Justice Garnham will deliver his ruling on the case in London on Wednesday.
The charity’s legal team previously told the court that, eight years after the UK was found to be in breach of European Union limits on the pollutant, levels were still too high in 37 out of 43 zones across the country.
Nathalie Lieven QC said: “On Defra’s (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) own assessment, there continues to be a very significant impact on human health for many years into the future.”
The charity won two previous rulings against ministers over failures to meet legal limits for the pollutant.
Its latest case was brought against the Environment Secretary and the Transport Secretary, while a claim against the Welsh Government was discontinued after it agreed to work with ClientEarth on new proposals.
The charity wants a declaration that current plans to improve air quality are “unlawful” because they do not bring nitrogen dioxide levels within legal limits in the “shortest possible time”.
ClientEarth also asked for an order forcing the Government to propose and implement extra measures urgently, to “rectify shortcomings” within the present scheme.
During a hearing in January, Ms Lieven said levels will not be within legal limits until 2028 in London and 2021 in the majority of other zones around the UK unless further action is taken.
She argued the Government should consider additional measures in five cities where clean air zones will be introduced by next year and said there were “no concrete plans” for reducing nitrogen dioxide levels in 45 local authorities.
Lawyers representing the Government urged Mr Justice Garnham to dismiss the charity’s case.
Kassie Smith QC, for the Environment Secretary, argued the complaints made about the Government’s plans were “misconceived”, as work was being undertaken to improve air quality in each of the five cities and 45 local authority areas.
She also said new measures could not be introduced in time to “bring forward” the Government’s compliance with the legal limits.
Following previous court orders, ministers revealed plans for reducing nitrogen dioxide, much of which comes from vehicles, to within legal limits in July.
The measures included £255 million to help local authorities come up with ways to improve air quality, and proposals to end the sale of all conventional petrol and diesel cars by 2040.
A Defra spokeswoman said: “Air pollution has improved significantly since 2010, but we recognise there is more to do which is why we have put in place a £3.5 billion plan to improve air quality and reduce harmful emissions.
“We will also end the sale of conventional new diesel and petrol cars and vans by 2040, and this year we will publish a comprehensive clean air strategy which will set out further steps to tackle air pollution.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here