Tesco is to remove "best-before" labels from nearly all its own-brand fruit and vegetables in a bid to cut food waste.
The supermarket giant says shoppers often find themselves "confused" by the difference between best-before and use-by dates - meaning perfectly edible food can often be thrown away.
In recent poll by the National Federation of Women's Institutes (NFWI), less than half of people asked knew the meaning of "best before", which indicates that food might not be at its optimum quality after this date, but is still safe to eat.
Use-by labels are used where there is a safety risk if the product is eaten past this date.
According to waste reduction body Wrap, two million tonnes of food is wasted each year in UK homes due to it not being used in time, with a third of this waste blamed on how shoppers interpret date labels.
Mark Little, Tesco's head of food waste, said: "We know some customers may be confused by the difference between 'best-before' and 'use-by' dates on food and this can lead to perfectly edible items being thrown away before they need to be discarded.
"We have made this change to fruit and vegetable packaging as they are among the most wasted foods.
"Many customers have told us that they assess their fruit and vegetables by the look of the product rather than the 'Best-before' date code on the packaging."
David Moon, head of business collaboration at Wrap, added: "This change by Tesco provides a good opportunity to learn about the customer response, and we anticipate Tesco will share their findings.
"With all fresh produce, appropriate storage including use of the refrigerator is essential in giving the customer more time to use their food, so clarity of storage advice on pack and in-store will be vital."
Nearly 70 Tesco lines, of products including apples, potatoes, tomatoes and lemons, will be included in the scheme.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel