Prawns have personalities and cautious crustaceans do better in the battle for food, new research suggests.
Scientists studied rockpool prawns and found some were consistently shy, while others were bolder.
But this bravery may come at a cost - as the risk-takers tended to do worse than other prawns when competing for food.
"We found that the shyer prawns were better at controlling a food source," said first author Daniel Maskrey, formerly of the University of Exeter but now at the University of Liverpool.
"This means that when they found food and possible rivals were nearby, they stayed and fed for longer than bolder prawns.
"The reasons for this aren't clear, but it's possible that bolder prawns have a higher urge to go on and continue exploring.
"We witnessed prawns fighting over food, and it could be that some use a bold exploration strategy because they favour searching for new food over competing with stronger rivals."
Boldness was tested by repeatedly putting prawns into an unfamiliar tank and seeing how much they explored and ventured into the middle.
Dr Tom Houslay, of the University of Exeter, said the study could help scientists understand why members of one species - and even the prawns in a single rockpool - have different personalities.
"Some individuals are more successful at monopolising food, while others are more willing to engage in potentially risky exploration," he said.
"In different conditions and situations, either of these strategies might pay off - which might explain why evolution has not led to a single personality type.
"The rockpools where these prawns live change with each high tide and having such variation among prawns could be crucial when it comes to adapting to these and other changes."
The prawns in the study were all from Gyllyngvase beach in Falmouth, and their feeding behaviour was tested using parcels of brine shrimp.
Prawns were split into groups of similarly sized individuals to compete for access to food.
- The study, Who dares doesn't always win: risk-averse rockpool prawns are better at controlling a limited resource, is published in the journal Animal Behaviour.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel