ENVIRONMENTAL campaigners have failed in their legal challenge against plans for almost 2000 new houses in the Cairngorms National Park.
They had challenged the Cairngorms National Park Authority's planning blueprint which would allow the developments which include a new town near Aviemore, An Camas Mor, with up to 1500 houses over the next 20 years, 117 new homes in the village of Carrbridge, 300 at Kingussie and 40 at Nethy Bridge.
The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Badenoch & Strathspey Conservation Group, the Cairngorms Campaign and the Scottish Campaign for National Parks joined forces to appeal a ruling in September by Lord Glennie in the Court of Session, which had rejected previous challenges.
This time they appealed on the grounds the appropriate assessment of the impact on housing on wildlife and the environment was unlawful because it was postponed to a later stage in the planning process. However this was rejected by Lady Paton yesterday.
Grant Moir, chief executive of the park authority welcomed the court's judgment in relation to the Cairngorms National Park Local Plan, reaffirming the rejection of all the grounds of challenge to the document.
"The local plan therefore remains in place as it stands and the Cairngorms National Park Authority will continue to work to deliver the four aims of the park collectively," he said.
But Craig Macadam, director of Buglife Scotland, said the park authority should have made a more rigorous scientific appraisal to assess the ecological impacts of proposed developments on the internationally designated features before including these in its Local Plan.
He said: "This ruling is a major setback not just for the protection of 'protected' wildlife, landscape and heritage in the Cairngorms but potentially for future assessments throughout the European Union where it set a precedent for inadequate assessment of sites."
He called for public support to continue the fight to safeguard "our irreplaceable natural heritage".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article