CAMPAIGNERS are calling on developers planning a wind farm near the Cairngorms National Park to abandon the project.
The Save Monadhliath Mountains (SMM) group welcomed last week's decision by SSE to drop its plans for a 27-turbine wind farm at Dalnessie near Lairg in Sutherland and a 12-turbine extension to the existing Fairburn wind farm in Easter Ross. SSE said it was because investment was no longer financially viable.
Now SMM is calling on RWE Innogy UK Ltd to follow suit by withdrawing the 31-turbine proposal at Allt Duine, where the closest turbine would be less than a mile from the Cairngorms National Park boundaries. Ramblers Scotland also backed the call for the development to be abandoned.
SMM spokesman Chris Townsend said: "Though RWE never tire of trying, it is not credible to argue that the wind farm's impact on the park can be overcome. The cabling, roads and turbines will have an irrevocable impact on the landscape, wildlife and ornithology of the park and the Monadhliath Mountains."
Jenny Gascoigne, RWE's wind development manager Scotland, said: "Although the nearest turbine is one kilometre from the Cairngorm National Park, the turbines would be shielded by the ridgeline which forms the park boundary at this location, and because of the carefully designed layout, the wind farm would not be visible from the A9 or settlements of Kincraig, Kingussie or Aviemore within the Strathspey Valley."
Meanwhile, no fewer than 100% of visitors coming to Aviemore and the Cairngorms area vowed to return, a customer survey found, and all said they would recommend the area to other people.
The survey was conducted by the Cairngorms Super Seven, a joint marketing group comprising of the seven major visitor attractions in the Aviemore and Cairngorms area, and took place last October.
More than 85% of people questioned were repeat visitors and 67% come to the area at least once a year.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article