THE final version of a map of Scotland's wildest land has been welcomed by conservationists but will continue to be controversial in some crofting areas.
The map, which supports the Government's new planning policy framework, was produced by Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) to identify the most extensive areas of the highest wildness.
It is supposed to help the planning process ensure there is no inappropriate development, such as large wind farms, in the areas identified.
It was prepared after a seven-week public consultation on a draft map at the end of last year.
As a result the number of wildland areas was reduced from 43 covering around 20 per cent of the country to 42 areas covering around 19.5 per cent.
The main changes are that one area in Perthshire is removed, as is one in the Borders. A stretch in Monadhliath Mountains is reduced following the decision by the Scottish Government to approve the 67-turbine Stronelairg wind farm nearby.
Ian Jardine, SNH chief executive, said: "One of our roles is to work with planners and developers to help get the right development in the right place.
"We do this by providing advice on nature and landscape. This new map helps to do this by identifying which are the key areas of wild land." The map has been largely welcomed by conservationists and recreational groups, with some qualifications. The wild land charity the John Muir Trust hailed it as "a historic breakthrough" in its campaign to have Scotland's wild land recognised and protected.
But there has been deep concern in some crofting areas about the draft map, not least on South Uist where it was feared attempts to reverse depopulation could be undermined. But the area of wild land on the island remains unchanged. The regulatory body the Crofting Commission had said that people like crofters, who had worked Scotland's remote rural landscapes for generations, were "rendered invisible " by the draft map.
The Western Isles Council had also expressed its concerns local control over development would be lost. A spokesman responded to the final map saying there was disappointment that the national planning policy framework still insisted on development plans having to safeguard the areas of wild land as identified in this map.
Huw Francis, chief executive of Stòras Uibhist, the community landowner of South Uist Estate, said "There was consultation but our submission has been ignored. We detailed serious concerns as to how it would affect South Uist, but to no avail." Local MSP Rob Gibson questioned why Garvey Island off Cape Wrath, which is used as a bombing range in military exercises, should be included.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article