THE European Commission has been criticised after it emerged that it is to fly local authority chiefs from across the continent to Brussels so they can attend a ceremony that celebrates their commitment to combating climate change.
Stirling is among 60 cities that has been invited to a "signature ceremony" in Belgium next week, after agreeing to become part of the European Commission's Covenant of Mayors' Initiative on Adaptation to Climate Change.
Under plans that are expected to be approved this week, the city council will send its provost and an official to the event, despite admitting that the travel will cause greenhouse gas emissions. It is estimated that a flight from Glasgow to Brussels and back for the delegation will create 0.39 tonnes of CO2. The signature ceremony, which forms part of a seven-hour event, is designed to "recognise and honour the leadership being shown by mayors across Europe".
Jamie McGrigor, environment spokesman for the Scottish Conservatives, said: "This appears to be a massive waste not just of money, but of energy too. What kind of example can a climate change summit set when it so pointlessly jets people in from across the continent? This is exactly the kind of eccentric decision making which increases suspicion of the EU among the general population."
Wile the EU is to pay up to £400 in expenses, costs over the amount will be met by the council's budget.
Green MSP Alison Johnstone said: "Coordinating low carbon innovation by cities is much needed, but the EU should be leading on making video-conferencing work better rather than paying out thousands for polluting flights."
A spokeswoman for Stirling council said that the event was "an opportunity for Stirling to demonstrate its commitment, on the European stage, to tackling the impacts of climate change". A spokesman for the European Commission said pollution from flights were covered by an emission trading system.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article