AN operation to stop a gas leak on a North Sea oil platform has got under way almost two months after the problem was first detected.
All 238 staff were evacuated from Total's Elgin platform, around 150 miles off Aberdeen, when the leak was detected on March 25.
At one point about 200,000 cubic metres of gas was leaking from the platform every day but this was said to have reduced by two-thirds when workers drilled a relief well last month.
Total was granted approval from the Department of Energy and Climate Change more than a week ago to "kill" the well by pumping heavy mud into it. It said progress would be monitored for a few days to see if it had worked.
The firm said yesterday: "Total has started the planned well intervention operation to stop the leak from the G4 well on the Elgin complex. The operation got under way with the pumping of heavy mud into the well from the support vessel, the West Phoenix semi-submersible drilling rig, via a temporary pipeline to the G4 wellhead.
"Depending on the conditions inside the well, the operation itself and the subsequent observation period will last a few days before it is possible to confirm whether it has been fully effective."
Two options are being worked on by the company to stop the leak: blocking the well with mud and drilling a relief well to try to capture the gas.
Experts said pumping mud into the well is a cheaper and faster option but it could be more dangerous because it needs people to re-board the platform.
Dr Richard Dixon, director of environmental charity WWF Scotland, said: "Good luck to Total in stopping the gas leak from the Elgin platform.
"In nearly two months since the leak started, around 5500 tonnes of the potent greenhouse gas methane has escaped, equivalent to adding around 45,000 extra cars on the roads of the UK for a year.
"The leak underlines the risks of the offshore oil industry, even in the familiar North Sea waters."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article