IRATE residents have warned of a potential health risk posed by a build up of human waste on a picturesque Firth of Clyde beach.
This year's summer heatwave brought a greater number of weekend campers than usual to the village of Portencross in North Ayrshire.
Disgusted residents also witnessed a steady build-up of litter, spoiled bonfires and human faeces.
They have now complained to the local authority about the mess but say that the response given to their concerns was "laughable".
One local woman, Audrey Naismith Kolon, argued the local landscape was being spoiled and called on the council to recognise the obvious health issues.
She said: "I don't really have a problem with people camping on the beach; in fact most of them are very nice. But the mess they leave behind is just not acceptable and no one seems to be paying attention to this problem.
"They arrive here with a handful of tents and stay for a few days, very few bury or dispose of their waste at all.
"Some have been defecating in and around the rocks and the foreshore and even leaving spoiled toilet paper behind."
The Ayrshire Costal Path runs through Portencross and many walkers, picnickers and families visit the beach and the remains of Portencross Castle, which dates back to the 14th century.
Mrs Kolon added: "The council have an obligation to the protection of public health and the implications here are serious.
"Public toilet facilities are few and far between and if the council are unwilling to finance permanent toilets in the area then the least they could do is provide temporary Portaloos during the summer."
A spokesperson for North Ayrshire Council said: "The site being used by campers is privately owned and its use is the responsibility of the land-owner.
"We do not believe that this is a dedicated campsite and would not expect campsite facilities to be maintained there.
"We would, however, remind people of their responsibilities when enjoying the local countryside so that other local residents and visitors can enjoy this section of the coastline."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article