SEABIRDS alter course to avoid colliding with offshore wind farms, a new study has found.
Most manage to avoid the marine turbine sites, the study suggests, with 99 per cent changing their flight path in order to avoid crashing mid-air.
However, the researchers said it was still unclear what effect the developments have on some vulnerable species and it was important for planners not to "get lulled into a false sense of security by these figures".
Dr Aonghais Cook, research ecologist at British Trust for Ornithology, who led the study, said: "It is important not to get lulled into a false sense of security by these figures.
"Whilst 99 per cent of birds may avoid turbines, collision may still be a significant risk at sites with large numbers of birds. Furthermore, there are still a number of key gaps in knowledge for some vulnerable species."
The British Trust for Ornithology and the University of Highlands and Islands' Environmental Research Institute in Thurso did the study, which was carried out on behalf of Scottish Government body Marine Scotland Science.
The BTO says that when planning offshore wind farms, it is important to derive "robust estimates"of the number of birds likely to collide with turbines in order to help the decision making process.
While most birds will take action to avoid colliding, a proportion will not.
A significant proportion of gannets will avoid even entering a wind farm, however, gulls are much less cautious and may even be attracted to the sites as a result of the foraging opportunities they offer.
Despite this, once inside the wind farms even gulls seem to show a strong avoidance of the turbine blades.
"While there are still significant gaps in our knowledge of bird behaviour within offshore wind farms, this work represents a major step forward, helping to ensure decisions are based on the best available evidence," said the BTO.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article