A giant wind farm on Shetland, which has divided island opinion for years, has been given the go ahead by the UK Supreme Court, after a series of legal setbacks.
Judges said that planning consent for Viking Energy's plans for the 103-turbine development on the Shetland mainland, should stand.
The 370MW wind farm is projected to power more than 175,000 homes, if a new subsea cable is installed to take all the the green energy to the mainland. Shetland only has a population of about 22,000.
In September 2013 the Court of Session had ruled the planning permission granted by Scottish ministers was incompetent.
The Sustainable Shetland campaign group had sought judicial review of the decision. The original plan for 150 turbines was initially reduced to 127 after consultations and then the Scottish Government reduced the number further to 103 to resolve an issue regarding Scatsta airport.
But the 850-strong Sustainable Shetland campaign group argued that ministers could not reasonably have established the scientific facts over the protection of the endangered whimbrel bird without a public inquiry.
Lady Clark was persuaded and set aside planning consent as a result.
The Scottish Government went back to the Court of Session in July last year and won, so Sustainable Shetland appealed to the Supreme Court.
But now the Supreme Court has found that ministers did have due regard to improving the conservation status of the whimberel and the limited impact of the development.
Viking Energy chairman Alan Bryce said: "We are delighted the Supreme Court has endorsed the planning consent for Viking wind farm, granted in April 2012. We can now concentrate on developing what would be one of the world's most productive wind farms, to generate renewable energy and significant income for the Shetland community. I would like to thank all who have supported us in reaching this positive outcome. Viking Energy looks forward to making progress during 2015."
But Frank Hay, Chair of Sustainable Shetland said:
We are naturally very disappointed to hear that our appeal to the Supreme Court has been unsuccessful, and are keenly aware that it will be distressing for our many members and supporters who enabled us to challenge the Scottish Ministers' planning consent for the Viking Windfarm.
"Our opposition to the windfarm - and its dire implications for the Shetland community and environment - remains undiminished. What we do next as far as that is concerned depends to a certain extent on a properly considered reading of the judgement, on what options are available to us outwith legal action, and on the wishes of our members.
"Our main priority for now, however, is to honour our financial commitments which are considerable, and for which we shall continue to fund-raise. Finally, we wish to extend our sincere gratitude to all those who have supported us, and continue to do so, in a campaign which is surely unprecedented in Shetland's history."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article