Watching TV for long periods of time puts people at risk of deadly blood clots, experts have warned.
Sitting in front of the TV for five or more hours on average per day leads to twice the risk of fatal pulmonary embolism as watching less than two and a half hours per day.
The 18-year study on more than 86,000 people found a level of risk normally associated with flying.
Toru Shirakawa, public health research fellow in the Department of Social Medicine at Osaka University in Japan, who led the research, said people should stand up occasionally and drink water during programmes.
Presenting his findings at the European Society of Cardiology conference in London, he said: "We showed that prolonged television viewing may be a risky behaviour for death from pulmonary embolism.
"Leg immobility during television viewing may in part explain the finding."
He said people should "take a break, stand up, and walk around".
"Drinking water for preventing dehydration is also important."
Mr Shirakawa said prolonged use of computer games had also been linked to clots but no research had so far made a link with smartphones.
"The link between prolonged sitting and pulmonary embolism was first reported among air raid shelter users in London during the Second World War," he said.
"Nowadays, a long haul flight in an economy class seat is a well known cause of pulmonary embolism that is called economy class syndrome.
"Pulmonary embolism is a serious, sometimes fatal, lung-related vascular disease characterised by sudden onset of symptoms such as chest pain or difficulty breathing.
"The disease is caused by obstruction of the pulmonary arteries by blood clots, generally formed in the leg vessels."
The research looked at 36,007 men and 50,017 women aged 40 to 79.
They reported how much television they watched each day and were then followed for 18 years.
During the course of the study, there were 59 deaths from pulmonary embolism.
After adjusting for other factors that might influence the results, the experts found people had twice the risk of a clot if they watched five or more hours, rising to a six-fold risk if they were under 60.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here