The World Health Organisation (WHO) has downgraded the risk of Ebola.
The global health body said that the Ebola virus disease outbreak in West Africa no longer constitutes as a "public health emergency of international concern".
Although new clusters of cases continue to occur, the risk of international spread is now considered to be "low", according to WHO's Emergency Committee.
Countries affected by the outbreak now have the capacity to respond rapidly when cases emerge, it said.
Any restrictions on travel and trade with Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone should be lifted immediately, the committee added.
As of March 13, there have been 28,639 cases of Ebola virus disease and 11,316 deaths, according to WHO figures.
Dr Margaret Chan, director general of WHO, said: "The Ebola outbreak in West Africa is no longer a public health emergency of international concern.
"However a high level of vigilance and response capacity must be maintained to ensure the ability of the countries to prevent Ebola infections and to rapidly detect and respond to flare-ups in the future.
"These countries continue to require the full support of the international community."
She said that the committee considered the cluster of cases recently reported in Guinea, but they believed that the affected countries now have the "capacities and capabilities to manage such flares".
Dr Chan added that the "Ebola response capacity in West Africa is strong", adding: "The three countries now have the world's largest pool of expertise in responding to Ebola."
Ebola is one of the world's deadliest diseases with around half of cases resulting in death.
The disease spreads from person to person as a result of direct contact with the blood, organs or other bodily fluids of those infected, with healthcare workers among those most at risk.
The symptoms of Ebola are severe, with patients often overcome by a sudden onset of fever as well as weakness, muscle pain and headaches. Vomiting, diarrhoea, rashes, kidney and liver problems follow as the virus grips the body.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here