The NHS may lack enough key staff to make a seven-day service work properly, leaked Health Department documents reportedly reveal.
The assessments, obtained by The Guardian and Channel 4 News, are said to show senior officials have voiced concern over the lack of detailed costings, risk assessment, and limited data supporting the policy.
Channel 4 News reported that one document, a "risk register" for the seven-day services programme, dated July 25, refers to the possibility that there will not be enough resources to meet the deadline for the "complete roll-out" of the policy.
The documents are also reported to state that a "workforce overload" could mean it may not be possible to find enough skilled staff "meaning the full service cannot be delivered", according to the reports.
Another document, regarding a meeting with the 7 Day Services Governance Group, references under key risks and issues: "The detailed costs of delivering in hospitals, including accurate estimates of additional workforce requirements are not understood early enough," according to Channel 4 News.
No advance impact assessments have been done on how seven day services will affect GPs, hospitals, and urgent and emergency care, according to a further document called Building The Evidence Base, Channel 4 News said.
The leaked documents are said to express fears the policy may not deliver on its key aim of improving services at weekends, with one stating: "It is possible that the programme delivers the planned outputs, but this does not result in the desired change (delivering against the plan but missing the point)."
The Government has promised to provide a "truly seven day service" by 2020, and the policy was a major source of tension during the bitter junior doctors' dispute.
British Medical Association head Dr Mark Porter said: "The BMA has been quite clear that patients should receive the same high standard of care seven days a week, but we have also repeatedly raised concerns over the past year about the lack of detail and absence of any plan on how the Government intends to deliver this.
"To see in black and white that the Government has not only ignored these concerns - and those of other leading healthcare organisations - but has also disregarded its own risk assessment's warnings about the lack of staffing and funding needed to deliver further seven-day services, is both alarming and incredibly disappointing."
A Department of Health spokesman said: "Over the past six years eight independent studies have set out the evidence for a 'weekend effect' - unacceptable variation in care across the week.
"This Government is the first to tackle this, with a commitment to a safer, seven day NHS for patients and £10 billion to fund the NHS's own plan for the future, alongside thousands of extra doctors and nurses on our wards."
Dr Porter said: "If the Government wants to make more services available across seven days, then it needs to urgently address how it will staff and fund them rather than continue to mislead the public and brand doctors - who already work round the clock, seven-days a week - as a roadblock to their plans."
President of the Royal College of Physicians, Prof Jane Dacre, told Channel Four News: "We would be very keen to give the same quality of care for patients seven days a week as we are able to do in five, but at the moment we are struggling to deliver good quality care over five days.
"So, to just expand to seven days and expect the quality to be the same, it's not surprising there are problems."
The leaked documents also expressed concern about the impact of Brexit on the high number of NHS staff from the EU.
Labour shadow health secretary Diane Abbott said: "This is a shocking indictment of the Tory Government's plans. They pressed ahead with their proposals even when campaigners and NHS staff argued they were unworkable.
"It has now been confirmed by the advice the Government received from its own civil servants.
"This is a scandal. The Government is undermining the NHS with plans it knew to be unworkable."
Ms Abbott said she would be contacting Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt to see if he had misled parliament.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel