Millions of Britons taking to the barbecue this weekend are at risk of food poisoning because they believe burgers can be left pink in the middle like steak, the Food Standards Agency has warned.
Almost a third of Britons (32%) incorrectly believe that eating a rare burger is the same as a rare steak when it comes to food poisoning risk.
Despite almost three quarters of people (71%) worrying about food poisoning, 36% would eat a burger that is not fully cooked through and more than one in 10 said they actually preferred them this way, a survey for the FSA found.
Read more: 10 places to eat... burgers
It is warning that "burgers are not like steak" and urged those set to enjoy a barbecue to ensure the meat is steaming hot throughout with no pink in the middle and the juices running clear.
Harmful bacteria such as E.Coli can be carried on the surface of cuts of meat, but can be mixed all the way though a burger as the meat is minced.
FSA director of policy Steve Wearne said: "It's important that people realise that burgers are not like steak.
Read more: 10 places to eat... burgers
"Harmful bacteria can be carried on the surface of cuts of meat.
"When a rare steak is seared these bacteria are killed, but burger meat is minced so bacteria from the surface of the raw meat gets mixed all the way through the burger.
Read more: 10 places to eat... burgers
"These bacteria can remain alive on the inside, unless the burger is fully cooked through, no matter how good quality and expensive the meat."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here