Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Willie Rennie has claimed the Scottish Government's forthcoming mental health strategy "needs a major rewrite".
He highlighted criticism from organisations including Marie Curie on the draft plan and said many think it is "not good enough".
He raised concerns at First Minister's Questions on mental health provision at young offenders institutions, saying there had been a sixfold increase in attempted suicide at YOI Polmont.
Nicola Sturgeon said young people in detention should have access to good quality mental health services to deal with what is often the underlying causes of their offending.
She said the new strategy is aimed at meeting the rising demand for mental health services along with additional funding, including the £10 million recently announced for a two-year project to boost support at primary care level.
Mr Rennie said: "The problem for the First Minister is that mental health strategy doesn't even mention young offenders. I have told her before that many organisations think the strategy is just not good enough.
"Marie Curie said it had nothing for the terminally ill. It is being criticised by the Royal College of Nursing, by psychiatrists and by a whole lot of charities.
"The £10 million announced at the weekend was a drop in the ocean. All the while people are struggling. Hundreds of teenagers are still waiting over a year to get the help they need. Eleven out of 14 health boards can't even meet the basic target and Police Scotland has lost 200,000 working days from mental ill health.
"Does the First Minister accept that this draft mental health strategy - which is already a year late - needs a major rewrite?"
Ms Sturgeon said: "I think the problem for Willie Rennie here is that he is alleging that the mental health strategy doesn't cover this particular issue but the mental health strategy hasn't actually been published yet. It will not be published until the new year.
"We are taking time and care to make sure that the responses, some of which have been cited by Willie Rennie, are properly taken into account."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article