SUPERMARKET shoppers are set to become the subjects of a new experiment which will encourage them to buy more fruit and vegetables and less meat.
Oxford University researchers have teamed up with supermarket giant Sainsbury's to redesign the layout of aisles in a bid to alter consumers' behaviour.
The initiative includes proposals to place vegetarian alternatives on the same shelves as meat products; giving vouchers and loyalty points to shoppers who choose vegetarian products; and providing recipes and leaflets that outline how shoppers can consume less meat.
A selection of Sainsbury's outlets, from smaller high street branches to some of its superstores, will take part in the pilot.
It is being funded by £5 million from the Wellcome Trust.
It follows a study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in the US last year which concluded that eating less meat could reduce global mortality by 6-10 per cent and cut greenhouse gas emissions by 30-70 per cent.
Susan Jebb, professor of diet and population health at Oxford University, said: "Red meat is high in saturated fats and that is not good for us. The consumption of meat is also linked to cancer and cardiovascular disease. Most advice suggests that we should eat around 70g a day. However, most people eat a lot more than that. We have to cut that amount, and persuade people to eat more fruit and vegetables instead."
Judith Batchelar, director of brand at Sainsbury's added: "Shoppers can now choose from a much greater variety of produce than they did in the past, especially when it comes to fruit and vegetables.
"That gives them a greater opportunity to make meat-free choices, which is what we are seeing today. The question is: how can we take that further?"
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel