Women who smoke during pregnancy and after giving birth may risk damaging the hearing of their children, a study suggests.
Nicotine exposure before birth and during breastfeeding can cause a key brain region that processes sound to develop abnormally, results from a mouse study show.
The research is the first to demonstrate that the auditory brain stem is vulnerable to nicotine.
Children with impaired function in this part of the brain are likely to have learning difficulties and problems with language development.
The German scientists added nicotine to the drinking water of pregnant mice at levels equivalent to those taken up by heavy smokers.
After the offspring were born, the firing and signalling function of neurons in their brains was tested.
Compared with unexposed offspring, neurons sensitive to input from the inner ear were less good at transmitting signals to other brain cells.
The signals they did transmit were also less precise, so that the coding of sound patterns was disrupted, the findings published in The Journal of Physiology showed.
Lead researcher Professor Ursula Koch, from the Free University of Berlin said: "We do not know how many other parts of the auditory system are affected by nicotine exposure. More research is needed about the cumulative effect of nicotine exposure and the molecular mechanisms of how nicotine influences the development of neurons in the auditory brain stem.
"If mothers smoke during pregnancy and their children show learning difficulties at school, they should be tested for auditory processing deficits.'
Nicotine exposure during pregnancy was already known to harm foetal brain development.
Mothers who smoke or use e-cigarettes or nicotine replacement therapy have an increased risk of premature delivery or giving birth to a lightweight child. They are also more likely to experience sudden infant death.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel