NO need to fret – worrying is good for you, according to research.
People who breeze through life are more vulnerable to ill health than those who continually anxious, says a leading psychologist.
But the old adage about “worrying yourself sick”, or even “to death”, is still true – when it gets over the top.
Professor Kate Sweeny, of California University, Riverside, said: “Extreme levels of worry are harmful to one’s health. I do not intend to advocate for excessive worrying. Instead, I hope to provide reassurance to the helpless worrier – planning and preventive action is not a bad thing. Worrying the right amount is far better than not worrying at all.”
Her study, published in Social And Personality Psychology Compass, said there is an “upside to worrying”. It inspires preventive and protective behaviour, and helps people avoid unpleasant events.
Ms Sweeny said: “Despite its negative reputation, not all worry is destructive or even futile. It has motivational benefits, and it acts as an emotional buffer.”
She found worry is linked with recovery from traumatic events, changing and and planning behaviour to make it safer, getting over depression, taking part in health promoting activity and preventing illness.
People who report greater worry may also perform better in school or at work, seek more information in response to upsetting events and engage in more successful problem solving.
Ms Sweeny said previous research has found worriers are more likely to wear seatbelts, for instance, and use sun cream to guard against skin cancer.
Cancer fears also fuel more breast self-examinations, regular mammograms and clinical breast tests among women.
Ms Sweeny said: ““It seems that both too much and too little worry can interfere with motivation, but the right amount of worry can motivate without paralysing.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here