Women who currently use hormonal contraceptives have a 20% higher risk of breast cancer than those who do not use them, according to new research.
The work is said to be the largest study of its kind ever conducted on breast cancer and hormonal contraception such as the combined pill, the progestogen-only pill and non-oral products such as the hormone-intrauterine system (IUS).
It followed 1.8 million Danish women aged under 50 from 1995 to 2012 to assess breast cancer risk in users of different types of hormonal contraception as compared to women who had never used hormonal contraception.
Researchers found that in current and recent users of any type of hormonal contraception, the risk of breast cancer was 20% higher, with 11,517 new breast cancers detected during the study period.
The research was carried out by Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, in collaboration with the University of Aberdeen.
However, the study suggested the numbers affected were likely to be low.
Professor Phil Hannaford, who led the research team based in Aberdeen, said: "Breast cancer is rare in young women.
"In this study, the absolute extra risk of breast cancer associated with use of hormonal contraception among all women age 15-49 was 1.3 per 10,000 person-years, or one extra breast cancer for every 7,690 women using hormonal contraception for one year."
The study found little evidence of consistent differences in risk between users of combined oral contraceptives with different progestogens.
Researchers did not detect an increased risk in former users who had used hormonal contraception for less than five years while the increased risk in long-term users gradually decreased by time and disappeared five to ten years after stopping.
Users of progestogen-only contraceptives (mainly pills and the IUS) experienced an increased relative risk of breast cancer.
Prof Hannaford also pointed to research published earlier this year and said the two studies suggest that today's pills have similar cancer risks and benefits as older preparations.
He said: "Earlier this year, the world's longest-running study of the effects of taking the contraceptive pill published its latest findings.
"The Royal College of General Practitioners' (RCGP) oral contraception study, also run from the Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, examined the very long-term cancer effects associated with the pill by following an original cohort of 46,000 women for up to 44 years.
"The study found an increased risk of breast and cervical cancer in current and recent pill users, risks which disappeared within approximately five years of stopping oral contraception.
"Importantly, the study also found that women who had ever used the pill were less likely to have colorectal, endometrial or ovarian cancer than women who had never used the pill - benefits that persisted for many years after stopping the pill, perhaps 30 or more years.
"New cancer risks did not appear as the women got to the age when cancer becomes common.
"The similar breast cancer results in both cohort studies suggest that today's pills have similar cancer risks and benefits as older preparations.
"If this suggestion is confirmed, then evidence from the Royal College of General Practitoners' study indicates that, like previous generations of users, today's pill users do not increase their overall lifetime risk of cancer by choosing hormonal contraception."
The study is published in New England Journal of Medicine.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel