Three-quarters of cases of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can be traced back to exposures during childhood, a study has found.
COPD is the name for a group of lung conditions which cause breathing difficulties including emphysema and chronic bronchitis, which mainly affect middle-aged or older adults who smoke.
While smoking remains the biggest risk factor for COPD, the Australian study showed that childhood illnesses – such as asthma, bronchitis, pneumonia and eczema – and exposures to parental smoking were also linked to the disease.
A second study published in the Lancet Respiratory Medicine journal also suggested there could be a window of opportunity during childhood to reduce the risk of poor lung function in later life.
Both studies identified pathways of how lung function changed over life, which were associated with different risk factors and disease risk in later life.
The study authors believe these insights are important for lung disease prediction, prevention and treatment.
The first piece of research, led by the University of Melbourne, saw 2,438 participants from the Tasmanian Longitudinal Health Study tracked from childhood to the age of 53, making it the largest and longest-running study of its kind.
Lung function was measured at the ages of seven, 13, 18, 45, 50 and 53-years-old, and participants’ exposure to various risk factors was also recorded.
The authors identified six distinct pathways describing how lung function changed with age, three of which were associated with COPD.
These three groups were described as having below average lung function in early life and a quick decline in lung function in later life, having persistently low lung function, and having below average lung function.
The three pathways were also linked to an estimated three-quarters of all cases of COPD occurring at the age of 53 (75.2% overall).
For moderate-to-severe COPD, all cases arose from these three trajectories.
These three pathways were also linked to childhood asthma, bronchitis, pneumonia, allergic rhinitis, eczema, parents having asthma or smoking, and the participants themselves smoking or having asthma.
The study authors suggested the childhood risk factors were important indicators of COPD risk, which were aggravated by smoking and having asthma in adulthood.
This amplified the damage already caused by childhood risk factors, and may have resulted in a more rapid decline in lung function.
As a result, the authors said it would be important to reduce parental smoking, encourage immunisation, and avoid smoking to promote healthy lung function pathways and minimise COPD risk, especially for people who had low childhood lung function or whose parents smoked.
Ensuring all people with asthma had appropriate treatment may also be vital to preserving lung function.
Study author Professor Shyamali Dharmage, of the University of Melbourne, said: “These findings highlight the importance of preventing both early life adverse exposures that could lead to poorer lung growth, and adult risk factors contributing to accelerated lung decline.
“COPD is expected to be the third largest cause of death globally by 2030, and it is important that we identify its key causes so that this burden can be reduced.
“Reduction of maternal smoke exposure and personal smoking and promotion of immunisation are identified as public health targets to prevent poor lung function pathways.”
In the second study, 2,632 participants were tracked from birth to 24-years-old, with their lung function measured.
It found that around three-quarters of infants aged one to six months with poor lung function improved throughout their childhood, indicating a window of opportunity to increase lung function and potentially reduce risk of COPD in later life.
The study authors said this suggested interventions to maximise lung growth in early childhood might modify the risk of COPD in older age.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel