POLITICIANS have called for urgent action to deal with a shortage in the number of paediatric doctors in place across Scotland.
Figures showing that hospitals are repeatedly failing to attract suitable applicants for the posts, leaving some positions lying vacant for two years, are said to be threatening the future of children's wards.
MSPs urged Health Secretary Alex Neil to do more to ensure staff are recruited after details were revealed in The Herald.
Labour's shadow health spokesman Jackie Baillie said: "While Alex Neil sits back and does nothing, services are under threat and the recruitment crisis grows. While the SNP fail to listen to more independent voices saying that our NHS is in crisis, the future of our children's hospitals are far from clear.
"With the NHS budget being cut, 2500 fewer nurses and midwives, fewer beds, health boards with budget deficits, record complaints, treatment targets missed and now too few doctors to treat children; we can't trust the SNP with our NHS."
The European Working Time Directive, tightened immigration policies on recruiting staff from outside the EU, and more female doctors taking maternity leave or part-time hours, have been blamed.
Last year, St John's Hospital in Livingston was shut for three weeks due to a short-term staffing crisis.
Scottish Liberal Democrat health spokesman Jim Hume MSP added: "It is clear lessons have not been learnt from the staffing shortage at St John's.
"It is simply unacceptable to have consultants working well beyond the end of their shifts, vacancies going unfilled for two years and hospitals in some cases operating with less than half the paediatric staff they need. Parents must have confidence that wards are operating at world-class levels instead of teetering on the brink of closure."
A Scottish Government spokesman said: "In preparing their workforce plans, [health] boards are required to consider relevant local issues and demographic changes and assess the resultant demands and implications for service delivery."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article