l NHS Grampian's report reveals it marked patients as unavailable after informing them they might not be treated within the target time frame – even though the patient was available but had simply agreed to wait longer for treatment.
NHS Grampian say: "No evidence of any kind had been found that Grampian staff manipulated waiting list figures to achieve national targets.
"We would also wish to highlight the arrangements we implement have involved patients in all decisions affecting their pathway of care.
"Thousands of waiting times transactions are carried out every year. Errors do happen but these are genuine and not evidence of systemic failures."
l NHS Tayside's report says a number of staff "spoke of instances of inappropriate behaviour including pressure on them to use unavailability to prevent breaches."
In some instances, staff were "just told to do whatever was required to clear the list".
Out of 367 cases reviewed by NHS Tayside, 25% did not appear to have been handled in line with Government guidance and 17% are described as "causing particular concern".
Examples from NHS Tayside include patients being marked as unavailable "simply to avoid a month end breach" and, as in Grampian, patients being marked unavailable because they had been told treatment could not be delivered on time.
l In a sample of 297 records checked, NHS Lanarkshire found 17% of transactions were not in line with guidance. They note that "on occasion written offers (of appointments) were being sent to patients two or three days prior to appointment date." They also say "periods of unavailability were added retrospectively up to 138 days after the period of unavailability started."
However the board says their view is these issues were to do with misunderstandings and not manipulation.
l NHS Highland says in the sample of cases it tested there were a small number of issues, including a patient who had been marked unavailable for 26 days "apparently without sufficient justification".
The board noted that when staff suspended patients from waiting lists, they often did not record details about why they had done so. This occurred in around a third of the test cases.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article