The parents of brain-cancer patient Ashya King say they will not return to the UK until they get assurances from authorities about what will happen to their child.
Brett and Naghmeh King sparked an international manhunt when they removed their five-year-old son from Southampton General Hospital on August 28 without medical consent.
Ashya has now completed a course of treatment at the Proton Therapy Centre (PTC) in Prague. "He's communicating with us, because he can hear us and he can see us. He's so much, so much better now and we're really happy with him, the fact that he's saying a few words as well," Mrs King said."He's improving each day."
Speaking from the family's home in Spain, Mr King said: "It's all been worth it."
He said Ashya could now walk with support, whereas previously "it was almost like we were carrying him".
But the family fears Ashya could be removed by British authorities if they return to the UK. "If they ever try to take Ashya away that would kill us," Mr King said.
"Until things are established with what's going to happen with Ashya, we feel too scared to return."
He said the family is in contact with an MP who was seeking information from child protection and health services on their intentions.
"There's a real fear that we have, not regarding us being arrested again, but regarding Ashya," Mr King said. "We don't really know what social services and the NHS have in store for us …
"We've heard so many stories when families go back, they think it's safe to go back, the social services get involved. They take the child away. And then they give a gagging order for the parents so they can never explain their story."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article