A LEADING charity has said it is crucial that lessons are learned from cases in which vulnerable children "slip through the net" to prevent the repeat of tragedies.
The Herald revealed yesterday that a PwC investigation into Child Protection Significant Case Reviews at Scotland's largest health board, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, had shown there was a lack of evidence that learning from the most serious cases was being passed on to frontline NHS staff.
The consultants warned if lessons were not passed on, it could lead to similar incidents in the future.
Anne Houston, chief executive of CHILDREN 1st, said the issue of information not being passed on was a common one following the death of children as a result of abuse or neglect.
"We know that some vulnerable children can and do slip through the net, sometimes with tragic consequences," she said. "It is crucial that lessons are learned from such cases and shared as widely as possible with all professionals involved in the care and protection of children, including health and social services, police and teachers, to prevent such tragedies happening again.
"In every significant case review into a child's death in recent years, common issues have been the failure of professionals to act on information early enough and of agencies to share appropriate information about risks to a child. Often such reviews also show that more could have been done to engage with the family and the community around the child. Sharing information and following up on any concerns such information provides is crucial."
The investigation into NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde also found there was little evidence that recommended measures after Significant Case Reviews were implemented fully.
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde said following the audit, in September last year, it had "further enhanced protocols for cascading learning".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article