DIRECT elections to health boards will not be extended across Scotland, with NHS bosses instead being told to use alternative methods to get local people involved.
NHS Fife and NHS Dumfries and Galloway were involved in a trial in which members of the public could vote people on to the health boards.
But the turnout at the elections, held in spring 2010, was low, with the Scottish Government arguing that this was not the most effective way of involving local people.
Instead, health boards will look at how they can adapt initiatives tested in NHS Lothian and NHS Grampian to their own areas.
Grampian recruited two new board members after advertising more widely on local radio, newspapers and with flyers.
In NHS Lothian, wider advertising resulted in one new member joining the board, while another was found through the area's patient forums.
Health Secretary Alex Neil said: "These pilots have demonstrated that the most effective approach was a pro-active approach from boards to advertising and recruiting to posts. I am confident that these new measures will help to increase public engagement and improve local accountability.
"I have now asked health boards across Scotland to look at these pilots with a view to expanding their own recruitment process for health board members.
"I am confident that these measures will help to increase public engagement and improve local accountability more effectively than when we tested direct elections as part of the pilot."
Theresa Fyffe, director of the Royal College of Nursing Scotland, said: "When direct health board elections were proposed, the RCN argued consistently that other ways of engaging the public should be included in any election 'pilots'.
"We also raised our concerns about the cost of direct health board elections. The evaluation of the 'pilots' has shown that direct elections are not the best way to engage the public and we are pleased that the Government is acting on this evidence."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article