A HEALTH board has caused anger after partly blaming staff shortages on female workers who become pregnant and then choose to work only part-time.
NHS Fife's statement was branded "deeply offensive" by the Scottish Labour Party after it suggested the rise in females having children and working fewer hours was responsible for its low levels of medical staff.
The board referred to the "feminisation" of the workforce and said maternity leave "added pressure" to departments such as paediatrics.
Labour said the claims were "unacceptable in this day and age", and patients' groups said it would undermine staff morale.
The claims were made at an annual health review when NHS Fife admitted it faced "major challenges".
A statement said: "Challenges have been compounded by the feminisation of the training grade workforce and legislative and other changes which have made recruitment of locum staff difficult. The increased female medical workforce imposes an added pressure on availability of trainee doctors due to maternity leave and part-time working.
"This has led to an ongoing impact in some specialities (particularly paediatrics) and solutions need to be worked through both regionally and nationally."
In addition, an NHS Fife report in June said: "Feminisation of the medical workforce has led to capacity issues within some areas, as a result of periods of maternity leave and accommodating part-time working."
Helen Eadie, Labour MSP for Cowdenbeath in Fife, said: "It is unacceptable in this day and age to infer criticism of women in the workforce and I find it deeply offensive to families all over NHS Fife's workforce.
"I find it objectionable that the term 'feminisation of the workforce' is used. To single out female employees is not acceptable. All employees present opportunities and challenges, and all employees deserve to be valued.
"The problems faced by NHS Fife are not to do with so-called 'feminisation' but a simple reduction in the numbers of medical training posts.
"There are myriad reasons why staff have time off work. In this day and age many fathers play an increasing role in the care of children. Where are the stats on those men who undertake such a role?"
Dave Leung, founder of Fife Patients' Association, said the statement might undermine morale of the health board's female workers.
He said: "It's just ridiculous to criticise the female side of the workforce. It's just another example of mismanagement.
"There is poor morale in female staff. We've been contacted by a number of nurses saying management is distant from what's on the ground.
"[Chief Executive] John Wilson doesn't seem to have grasped the issues. The issues are the allocation of resources – there's not enough doctors and nurses – and the allocation of funds.
"This is poor human resources management, it just doesn't seem to connect with the staff."
Scottish Conservative health spokesman Jackson Carlaw said: "Since time began, healthcare has always been made up of predominantly women, so this 'feminisation' line is hardly new. Neither is the likelihood of females having children or requiring to work part time, so this sounds like a hugely dated – and desperate – excuse."
NHS Fife medical director Dr Brian Montgomery said: "We did not say female workers 'give us a headache'.
"We have acknowledged there has been an increase in the number of women choosing a career in medicine. This is a positive development, referred to as feminisation of the workforce. These comments have been taken out of context.
"Women have the right to choose to have families, however. It is recognised maternity leave and part-time working imposes an additional pressure on availability of trainee doctors."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article