STAFF at a Scottish hospital have been criticised by a health watchdog after calling an Alzheimer's patient "happily confused".
A report from Healthcare Improvement Scotland expressed concerns about disrespectful language and poor documentation after an unannounced visit by inspectors to St John's Hospital in Livingston, West Lothian.
The team identified areas of strength in treatment of elderly patients but cited 15 areas where improvements were required, saying staff's awareness and knowledge of delirium was poor. It was noted that ward buzzers were heard ringing unanswered for lengthy periods.
One patient with a known history of Alzheimer's had "happily confused" written in their patient health record.
The report said: "This is not respectful language to use when describing a patient with dementia.
"There was no plan of care for their dementia."
Regional inspector Ian Smith said that, while some wards at St John's had dementia champions, their role was unclear and it was "not evident" how they were improving dementia care.
The report added that NHS Lothian must ensure improvements to the ward and hospital environment were carried out to make it more suitable for people with dementia and cognitive impairment.
Sarah Ballard-Smith, nurse director at NHS Lothian, said yesterday: "It is pleasing to note 95% of patients interviewed felt the care they received was of a good standard.
"The inspectorate found we are performing well in relation to the care provided to older people, with warm, caring and meaningful interactions between staff and patients.
"Other areas of good practice include that our staff were seen to be treating patients with dignity and that the care we provide is compassionate and respectful. There were some areas which the inspectors felt could be improved upon and we have already addressed each of these issues."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article