HOSPITALS across Scotland are failing to meet a new legal duty to ensure patients wait no longer than 12 weeks for treatment, a report reveals.
Public spending watchdog Audit Scotland found only three health boards had met the Scottish Government's legally binding "treatment time guarantee" since it was introduced in October last year.
The guarantee - included in the SNP's flagship Patients Rights Act - was designed to ensure that inpatients and day case patients were treated within 12 weeks of their treatment being agreed.
However, only NHS Orkney, NHS Western Isles and the Golden Jubilee National Hospital at Clydebank have met their legal duty consistently.
In September, the most recent month surveyed, only six out of 15 health boards achieved the guarantee.
In a further blow to the Scottish Government, a second target to ensure patients wait no more than 12 weeks for their first outpatient appointment is also being missed increasingly by hospitals, the report found. A total of 11,544 people were waiting more than 12 weeks for an outpatient appointment in September, nearly double the number recorded at the same point in 2012.
The Audit Scotland report, out today, said health boards had found the 12-week inpatient guarantee "challenging".
It added: "NHS boards failing to meet the waiting times standards indicates pressure on their capacity.
"There are risks this pressure will increase as demand continues to grow."
The figures sent a serious warning to the Government, nurses' leaders said, while Scottish Labour described them as a shambles.
The findings emerged as health boards' performances were reviewed following a scandal over patients' waiting times being manipulated by NHS Lothian. Patients in that area were marked "socially unavailable" for treatment if they refused to travel to hospitals in England at short notice.
Today's report said the Scottish Government and NHS had taken steps to improve the management and monitoring of waiting lists.
But watchdogs said due to IT changes and the new 12-week guarantee, health boards were now publishing less information about their waiting times.
Royal College of Nursing Scotland Director Theresa Fyffe said: "This update is another serious warning shot across Government's bows to look again at the capacity within health boards to meet their waiting times targets."
Calling for a review of staffing and resources, she added: "All those working in our NHS know that behind all these statistics and figures are people - patients waiting to be treated in a system that's creaking under the strain."
Dr Brian Keighley, chairman of the BMA in Scotland, said: "Quality patient care and clinical priorities must remain the priority and should not be compromised by the legal requirement to achieve targets, particularly at a time when there are rising pressures on NHS capacity, falling budgets and increasing consultant vacancies."
Health Secretary Alex Neil said: "This report shows just how much progress has been made in improving the management of waiting lists across Scotland.
"In addition, we are continuing to support health boards to ensure they deliver waiting time standards and the waiting times guarantee. Health boards across Scotland are investing over £67 million this year in creating additional capacity to be able to treat more patients than ever."
Patients not treated in the timescale are entitled to an explanation from the health board and to have other arrangements put in place to ensure their treatment starts as soon as possible.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article