LOSING weight doesn't have to mean a complete diet overhaul.
A few basic food swaps can save over 1,000 calories a day.
A newly-published survey, from Evoke.ie, shows the average British person eats 3,440 calories every day.
We can take some comfort. Against certain other countries, the US obviously, we're not doing too badly - the average American puts away 3,770 calories.
But we shouldn't take too much comfort. Even our 'mere' 3,440 calories a day is nearly 10,000 more calories a week than we need. And it takes just 3,500 to put on just one pound. In only one month, that's almost a stone. It's a little alarming, isn't it? But it doesn't have to be, all you need to do is make a few simple swaps to your daily menu, and you're back down to a nice, safe, expert-recommended 2,000 calories.
Out: Latte
In: White coffee
You need your caffeine in the morning, and that's fine. But you don't need your latte; what you need is a simple white coffee (essentially the same but with less sickly milk).
Calories saved: 180
Out: Banana
In: Apple
Fruit is good for you, and that's why you're topping your cereal with a banana. Well done. But chop up an apple instead, and you've halved the calories.
Calories saved: 50
Out: Ginger Nuts
In: Nuts
Ah, the ill-fated elevensies, the moment we all eye the packet of biscuits and think 'just a couple won't hurt'. But they will, I'm afraid; 'just' two biscuits will hurt in the shape of 200 calories. Try a handful of nuts instead - often seen as the dieting enemy because they're high in fat, but it's good health-boosting fat.
Calories saved: 70
Out: Roll with your soup
In: Oatcakes
Soup might be a healthy choice (if it's home-made, otherwise it's packed with salt), but make it even healthier by ditching the accompanying roll and going for a couple of less bloating oatcakes.
Calories saved: 200
Out: Sandwich
In: Salad
Bear with us, it's not as boring as it sounds. Salads don't have to be one lonely bit of Iceberg, they can be a fancy new vehicle for your normal sandwich filling. Instead of putting your tuna/ham/egg on some bread, bung it on some (nicer Cos) lettuce. Easy.
Calories saved: 250
Out: Bar of milk chocolate
In: Square of dark chocolate
No, we never believed this either; one mouthful of dark chocolate, however good the quality, is never going to be as fun as lots of mouthfuls of milk chocolate. Is it? Actually, yes, because the higher cocoa content means you're still getting the same fix but with less faff.
Calories saved: 180
Out: Wine
In: Gin
Argue for antioxidants all you want, wine will never be good for you - not in a weight-loss way, anyway. Even a small glass contains about 120 calories, and a large is nudging 200. We're not saying don't drink, just drink gin and slimline tonic instead.
Calories saved: 70
Out: Pasta
In: Rice
It takes the same time to cook, it's cheap, and it goes with anything. So far, so even on the rice versus pasta front. But rice is also packed with vitamins, is a multigrain, and is an instant calorie save.
Calories saved: 150
Out: Chips
In: Potatoes
Some meals always need chips - fish and chips, for one. But, mostly, you can swap them for their humble cousin, the normal boiled potato, and barely notice a difference. Except in the substantial calorie save.
Calories saved: 150
Out: Peas
In: Broccoli
Peas aren't bad for you, but in a similar vein as the banana-for-apple cereal swap, they are more calorific than other things in the vegetable drawer. A portion of peas is 70 calories, broccoli is 30.
Calories saved: 40
Out: Yoghurt
In: Yoghurt
The key here is the type of yoghurt. Obviously, the new breed of chocolate flavoured ones are the bad type, but so are many fruit ones, masquerading as healthy but actually filling you up with sugar. Opt for a small pot of natural yoghurt with actual fruit.
Calories saved: 100
Total calories saved in a day: 1,440. Bingo.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article