THE number of complaints about doctors made by their colleagues or patients is on the rise, according to new figures.
Data from the General Medical Council (GMC) shows a jump in both patient complaints and the number of doctors willing to speak up about the poor standards of other medics.
In 2012, the GMC received 8109 complaints - a 24% increase since 2011 and a 104% increase since 2007.
Most complaints about doctors come from patients and from relatives and friends of those patients. Between 2007 and 2012, the overall number of complaints from the public rose by 87% to 5014.
The rest of the complaints came from a doctor's employer or were made by individual doctors about another doctor's fitness to practise.
The GMC, which regulates around 250,000 doctors in the UK, said the overall number of complaints was very small when the number of interactions between doctors and patients is taken into account.
And it said higher patient expectations and the greater willingness of other doctors to raise concerns could account for the rise.
Overall, 54% of the complaints were about clinical care or both clinical care and communication with patients.
Many complaints from individual doctors (38%) were about issues such as a conflict of interest or criminal convictions held by their colleagues.
Among the public, people aged 46 to 60 were the most likely to complain and women were more likely to complain than men.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article