JULIET Le Page spent her 20s and 30s forging her career as a physiotherapist and did not feel any maternal urges until she reached her early-40s.
That changed when she met her husband Richard, an investment manager, at the age of 42, and suddenly felt a deep longing to have a baby.
The couple, however, split up and did not get back together until a year later.
By this time Ms Le Page, who lives in Trinity, Edinburgh, realised that she was unlikely to get pregnant naturally and so she was referred for fertility treatment at the Edinburgh Royal Infirmary.
Following a two-and-a-half year wait for treatment she finally got pregnant with IVF using donor eggs and gave birth to a son, Rafe, when she was 47 years old.
Two years later she decided to have another child and this time she travelled to a private fertility treatment situated in Barcelona, Spain.
Again she was lucky to conceive on the first cycle with a donor egg and had her baby daughter, Julia, a day after her 50th birthday.
Ms Le Page is now 54 and her children, aged seven and five, are both at primary school but she does not feel she stands out at the school gate as particularly old.
"There are a lot of older mothers collecting children and I certainly don't feel like an exception," she said.
"If anything the mothers in the minority are those in their 20s."
Ms Le Page works with a group called Fertility Focus, which advises women wanting to get pregnant.
She says most of her clients are aged between 35 and 45. One client over 45 is expecting twins, having travelled to the Czech Republic for IVF treatment with egg donation.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article