THE Scottish Government has no plans to reduce the limit on terminating pregnancies, the Health Secretary said, after he reportedly stated there is "a case" for lowering it from 24 weeks.
Alex Neil said he believes the current limit should be looked at, although he would not be drawn on specifying a limit.
His comments came after UK Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt said he would like to see a ban on terminations more than 12 weeks into a pregnancy.
The intervention from the new Scottish Health Secretary drew criticism from Green co-convener Patrick Harvie and women's rights campaigners.
Speaking to a Sunday newspaper, Mr Neil suggested the cut proposed by Mr Hunt was not realistic but said he favoured a look at the current situation.
He said: "I do think there is a case to be had for a reduction from 24 weeks, but I don't know if 12 weeks is realistic, frankly.
"But I do think there is now a case, given the state of medical science and the fact that babies do survive from a much earlier stage in the pregnancy.
"I do think there is a case for looking to bring down the number of weeks, but that is a personal opinion."
Mr Neil said he would not pick a number weeks "out of the air", saying it was right to look at evidence on the subject.
Mr Harvie said Mr Neil's comments were "irresponsible".
He said: "As soon as I read that article I immediately put down a written question asking whether the Scottish Government remains committed to reproductive health services which are accessible and which support women's rights.
"I think this is an irresponsible way to present a personal opinion, so soon after becoming the new Health Secretary."
Following Mr Neil's comments, Kate Smurthwaite of the Abortion Rights campaign group said: "He seems to be saying that there's a case based on new medical evidence. I find that really surprising because there isn't any new evidence.
"The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists published a report quite recently saying they saw no reason to change the term limit and they don't believe there's been any significant improvement in the survival or viability rates for pre-term babies. Personally I think that the notion we should build a law based around the survival rates of pre-term babies is a weird way of doing it.
"I think it's so strange that politicians wade into this debate and feel that they have to start deciding what reasons are bad reasons [for having an abortion]. For me that infantilises women, it implies we're childlike and can't make these choices for ourselves."
After the newspaper article emerged, Mr Neil issued a statement setting out the Scottish Government's current position.
He said: "There is no government or party policy on the issue of abortion – either now or in an independent Scotland – because it always has been and always will be a matter for the conscience of individual parliamentarians.
"Therefore, by definition, there are no government proposals to reduce the current 24-week time limit. This was a mischievous presentation of my comments on what everyone should remember is a serious and sensitive issue of conscience."
Mr Neil's comments came after the Prime Minister said the UK Government has no plans to put forward legislation to reduce the time limit for abortion.
David Cameron did, however, make it clear there were opportunities for MPs to bring about a vote in the Commons, which would be treated as a matter of conscience.
Mr Cameron said Mr Hunt was expressing his personal view, and not the position of the Government.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article