A NEW study has found a link between obesity and poorer academic grades among adolescent girls.
Researchers measured the academic attainment of almost 6000 children against their body mass index.
The results showed that 466 girls classed as obese achieved poorer results aged 11, 13 and 16 years when compared to those of a healthy weight.
The link was less clear among boys, according to the team that led the study, from Dundee, Strathclyde and Bristol universities in collaboration with Georgia University in the US.
In English, maths and science, obese girls received results that were lower by an amount equivalent to a D instead of a C, which was the average in the sample.
Josie Booth, from Dundee University's school of psychology, said: "There is a clear pattern which shows that girls who are in the obese range are performing more poorly."
Around one-third of children aged between two and 15 are at risk of being overweight, including obese, according to figures from the Scottish Health Survey.
Professor John Reilly, the lead investigator from Strathclyde University, said: "It is clear that teenagers, parents and policy-makers in education and public health should be aware of the lifelong educational and economic impact of obesity."
The researchers said they took into account potentially distorting factors, such as poorer background, IQ and the age the girls began menstruating, but found they did not affect the overall results.
The study was funded by a Bupa Foundation grant to Strathclyde University.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article