Lacey Miller's parents always knew she would win her fight against cancer – because she never stopped smiling.
The two-year-old spent months in hospital clinging to life after being diagnosed with acute myeloid leukaemia.
She endured more than 20 blood transfusions, battled countless infections and was so weak she had to spend months in isolation.
However, the toddler, who was prescribed antibiotics for a chest infection just days before she was diagnosed, smiled through it all – giving mother, Claire Bruce, and father, Michael Miller, hope that their only child would survive.
After taking part in a Cancer Research UK drug trial and an intense five-month treatment regime, Lacey, from Fraserburgh, Aberdeenshire, is now a picture of health and cancer free.
And last week the youngster received a special Little Star Award from the charity in recognition of her courage and determination.
Her proud mother, who nominated her daughter for the accolade, said: "She's done so well and we just feel so lucky to have her.
"I always knew she would get through it. She was so brave during her treatment and always had a smile on her face. It was her smile which kept me and her dad going through what was such a difficult time."
Miss Bruce, 24, added: "We just had to take each day as it came. But I was always positive and sometimes if you think positive, positive things happen. Now to look at her you wouldn't know she had been so unwell.
"She's a bundle of energy and makes me laugh every day. She is so special and totally deserves this award."
Lacey, who completed a gruelling treatment regime two days before her first birthday, has been free of the disease for just over a year.
She is now well enough to attend nursery six hours a week and, like most children her age, loves books, drawing and playing with her toys.
Lacey, who still gets regular check-ups, has to be free of the disease for five years before she is officially given the all-clear.
However, Miss Bruce said: "Every year is a year closer to being cured and that's a good thing. Hopefully it will never come back."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article