DRUGS currently used to lower cholesterol offer greater benefits than side-effects, experts have said.
The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) said patients who are prescribed statins should continue to take them.
This is despite articles in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) earlier this year that said they could cause harmful side-effects and did not cut death rates.
The MHRA's monthly Drug Safety Update yesterday said latest evidence from large clinical trials has shown statins can save lives by reducing the risk of heart attacks, strokes and the need for heart surgery.
Statins are commonly prescribed for people at risk of heart attack because of their cholesterol-reducing properties, with as many as seven million patients thought to be using them regularly in the UK.
But scientists have signalled they also have anti-inflammatory effects.
And earlier this month the BMJ said it was setting up a panel of experts to decide whether it should completely retract two articles which suggested the drugs presented the risk of serious side-effects without a realistic prospect of cutting death rates.
The papers prompted a row, with one expert calling them "misleading".
Writing in the Drug Safety Update yesterday, the MHRA said most side-effects experienced by people who take statins are mild and muscle-related problems are the most frequently reported issues.
The product information lists advice about how to use statins and any potential side-effects, it said.
Dr June Raine, the MHRA's director of vigilance and risk management of medicines, said people should continue to take their statins as prescribed.
She said: "Large clinical trials have shown that statins can save lives by reducing the risk of heart attacks, strokes and the need for heart surgery."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article