DOCTORS believe a pioneering transplant technique that cleans and reconditions donor lungs could save the lives of many patients.
A UK-wide study has been welcomed by patients' groups who claim it will bring hope to many with chronic lung disorders.
Only one in five potential donor lungs in the UK is used in lung transplants. The rest are turned down because they are judged to be in too poor a condition to safely transplant, the team of doctors said.
Almost one-third of those currently waiting for a lung transplant at any one time will never be matched with a donor organ, and many will die before suitable organs are found, the doctors said.
The new technique, called ex-vivo lung perfusion or EVLP, involves cleaning and aerating the donor lungs after they are removed from the donor.
It is being piloted in a small-scale study and has already been shown to work in eight patients. Philippa Bradbury, 21, from Mirfield, near West Yorkshire, was given lungs reconditioned using the technique.
Ms Bradbury, who was diagnosed with cystic fibrosis at 15 months old, was put on the lung transplant waiting list and had four calls in five months for a transplant, but each time the donor lungs were unusable.
She said: "Before the transplant, I was in and out of hospital, my quality of life had really gone down. Unlike my friends of similar ages, I wasn't able to enjoy the spontaneity of going out and enjoying myself.
"I became too tired and too out of breath to do anything. After the transplant I was only in hospital for 11 days, because the reconditioned lungs were perfect."
The study is coordinated by the DEVELOP-UK team from Newcastle University and Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article