POLITICIANS have described a Bill to allow assisted suicide in Scotland as "significantly flawed" - but left it up to individual MSPs to decide how to vote.
A report issued by the Health and Sport Committee of the Scottish Parliament, which has scrutinised the proposal, warns there are "major challenges" to taking forward the legislation.
Their words have been welcomed by campaigners fighting against the Bill - which would create a system for helping people who are seriously ill and want to end their own life.
However, the report stops short of telling MSPs to throw out the Bill.
When a special committee examined a previous bid to legalise assisted suicide in Scotland in 2010, they said it should be rejected.
This time, the MSPs note the "good intentions" of the politician behind the Bill and conclude: "Whilst the majority of the committee does not support the general principles of the Bill, given that the issue of assisted suicide is a matter of conscience, the committee has chosen to make no formal recommendation to the parliament on the Bill."
Independent MSP Margo Macdonald brought both Bills to Holyrood and since she died last year Green MSP Patrick Harvie has championed her cause.
In recent weeks legal experts from Scottish universities have called for clear guidance on how anyone who helps a loved one to die will be treated by the law, saying there is an "alarming lack of clarity" in Scotland. Advice has been published showing when an assisted death is likely, or unlikely, to lead to prosecution in England.
However, the Health and Sport Committee report says the lack of clarity is a separate issue from permitting assisted suicides and goes on to raise concern that many aspects of the Bill itself are unclear. It questions what some of the words mean and what the "licensed facilitators," who would be introduced to help people die, would be allowed to do.
Nor were the MSPs persuaded that assisted suicides were an extension of existing practices such as patients refusing treatment or doctors giving doses of pain relief to terminally ill patients knowing the medication could hasten death.
The committee heard the bill could create a culture where people felt a "duty to be dead" and the report raises concern it could "communicate an offensive message to certain members of our community (many of whom may be particularly vulnerable) that society would regard it as 'reasonable', rather than tragic, if they wished to end their lives."
Dr Gordon Macdonald, of campaign group Care Not Killing, said: "This report confirms what we have said along.
"The bill is poorly thought out, ill-conceived, badly-drafted and effectively not fit for purpose.
"We are delighted that the committee agrees with us that the Bill contains significant flaws which are likely to prevent it from being enacted."
Sheila Duffy, spokeswoman for My Life, My Death, My Choice - which supports assisted dying, said: "We are content that the Health and Sport Committee has produced a report which seeks to inform the debate and makes no formal recommendation to the parliament on the Stage One vote, leaving the issue up to each MSP to decide for themselves. This is only right and proper with an issue subject to a free vote but is a huge step forward from a similar stage of previous attempts at this kind of legislation, reflecting the improvements that have been made."
She conceded amendments were required, but called for the Bill to pass Stage One to reflect public support for the debate.
MSPs are expected to vote on the proposal by the end of May. Last time the Bill was defeated by 85 votes to 16.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article