THE vast majority of the public believe that MSPs play political football with the NHS, a new poll suggests.
Almost three quarters of people (74 per cent) in Scotland think political parties design health policy to win votes, not to do what is best for the health service, the survey found.
The survey of 2000 people in the UK shows that two out of three people believe the NHS should manage itself without the involvement of politicians, and only one in three say Parliament should set health service targets.
The British Medical Association (BMA) released the poll, with Scottish results, to coincide with the start of its annual representative meeting in Harrogate.
The doctors' union has called for all political parties to put patient care before votes at the next election.
Dr Brian Keighley, Chairman of the BMA in Scotland, said: "In Scotland, we have not endured the massive reorganisation of the NHS that has happened in England, but political agendas here have stifled change and ... placed the NHS in an unsustainable position.
"This survey shows that the public is increasingly disenchanted with the use of the NHS as a political football by all political parties in Scotland.
"While the NHS remains high in public estimation, there is a significant majority of the population showing increasing impatience with decisions made with reference to opinion polls and potential votes rather than on grounds of clinical need.
"The public is not naive and is clearly suspicious of political interference in the NHS. They need to be convinced that decisions about their local health services are primarily about improving care."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article