THE father of a gifted young sportsman who took his own life two weeks after being sent home from hospital said the family's criticism of his treatment has been vindicated by an ombudsman's report into his mental health care.
Iain Bell was 20 years old when he was found dead at the family home in Dundee by his mother and 12-year-old sister in June last year after a battle with depression.
The young ice hockey star, who had represented Great Britain and captained Scotland under-19s, hung himself after his parents locked away medication in an attempt to protect him following a series of intentional overdoses.
His father, Martin Bell, complained to Scotland's public sector watchdog that NHS Tayside had not provided Iain with appropriate treatment and failed to communicate effectively with his parents after being sent home from hospital following his third suicide attempt in a year.
In a report published earlier this week, Jim Martin, the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman, said the case was one of two which highlighted "failures in mental health care and assessment".
In particular, Mr Martin noted that "at no point in [Iain's] care was an explicit assessment made of risk either in terms of the potential for future self-harm or suicidality".
Mr Bell, 48, said he felt "vindicated" by the ombudsman's findings after being rebuffed twice during his son's illness when he had attempted to raise concerns with senior staff at Ninewells Hospital in Dundee. The family is now consulting lawyers about suing NHS Tayside.
He said: "I'm absolutely glad that all this has come to light because it just shows that NHS Tayside have been blase about the whole thing.
"To have two meetings with the top people, who sat round the table and told me they followed all the right procedures, only to come up short on all of them really beggars belief. I'll be looking at legal advice to see if we can take it forward."
Iain, a trainee call centre operative, was 19 when he took his first overdose in June 2009. He blamed his attempted suicide on mounting money pressures and stress at work, where he felt he was being bullied by his boss.
He told doctors he had begun drinking heavily to cope. He was referred to a psychiatric nurse and was placed on antidepressants.
Initially, his parents believed he was responding well, but in January last year his behaviour became erratic and his mother, Moira, believed he was showing signs of bipolar disorder but psychiatrists rejected her fears.
In April 2010, Iain took a second overdose. Doctors blamed his deterioration on drinking binges and referred him for alcohol therapy.
Weeks later, he was left with a broken back after he plunged 30ft from a building in an expression of what medics called – mistakenly, his father insists – 'high jinks'.
"He broke his back, which killed off his ice hockey career," Mr Bell said. "That was put down to 'high jinks' and alcohol because he had started drinking heavily at that time to stave off the depression.
"We knew that it was another cry for help – he would never have jumped out of a building that high for fun."
In July 2010, Iain was admitted to accident and emergency at Ninewells after his third overdose in just over 12 months but a mental health evaluation concluded there was "no evidence of psychiatric abnormalities".
A nurse sent him home the same day with phone numbers for charity helplines but no follow-up appointment. Two weeks later, Iain took his own life.
Mr Bell said: "It wasn't even a card with a number on it – it was a brown envelope folded in half with a handwritten number for The Samaritans and Breathing Space. That was it.
"I thought, 'These are voluntary organisations – they're not experts in mental health; they aren't for people who are third-time suicidal, in your care'," he added.
The SPSO report coincides with figures published by ISD Scotland, the information services division for the health service, which reveal that a fifth of those who took their own life in Scotland last year had recent history of psychiatric illness.
A spokesman for NHS Tayside said the report would be discussed at a board meeting to be held on January 26 next year.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article