A HOSPITAL has been criticised for elderly care procedures in an official report, which found that a patient screened as high risk for malnutrition was not checked again for three weeks.
Records for some people who had been identified as "not for resuscitation" had not been completed properly when inspectors visited the Gartnavel General Hospital in Glasgow.
Inspectors identified 15 areas for improvement relating to nutrition, resuscitation procedures and dementia screening.
The report by Healthcare Improvement Scotland found that only one out of six Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACR) forms had been completed correctly by staff.
Three had been signed by junior doctors with no countersignature from the consultant responsible for care and on one form there was no evidence the patient had the capacity to make the decision.
Inspectors found mealtimes for elderly patients were poorly co-ordinated and patients were not prepared before their meal arrived.
A patient who was screened as "high risk" for malnutrition three days after admission was not checked again until three weeks later. Patients are required to be screened within 24 hours of admission and then weekly if identified as "high risk".
Inspectors said wards were not "dementia friendly" and screening for cognitive impairment was not routinely carried out in patients over 65 years when they were admitted as required.
There was "limited evidence" of effective discharge planning for patients, which can lead to patients being kept in hospital longer than required.
The elderly care inspection, by Healthcare Improvement Scotland, also found some patients are often moved from the Western Infirmary to Gartnavel in the late evening. The health board said an internal transfer system had been introduced to prevent late transfers.
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde also said it had put together an action plan to address the other areas for improvement.
However, inspectors saw good examples of caring and caring and friendly interactions between staff and patients.
Patient care was carried out in a way that maintained patient dignity and respect.
Of the 75 patients who completed a questionnaire, 92% said the quality of care they received was good.
Rory Farrelly, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde's Acute Director of Nursing said: "We were pleased the inspectors noted interaction between staff and patients was warm and caring, and that the majority of patients were positive about their stay.
"However, we recognise there are still areas we need to address and an improvement plan has been developed."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article