Smoking when pregnant can triple the risk of a child succumbing to a major cause of meningitis, research has shown.
Inhaling tobacco smoke in the home also made young children vulnerable to invasive meningococcal infection.
In the case of those under the age of five, passive smoking more than doubled the risk, a study found.
Scientists estimated that each year of exposure to second-hand smoke led to several hundred extra children being affected by invasive meningococcal disease in the UK.
Meningococcal bacteria are responsible for the most dangerous form of meningitis and can also invade the blood, lungs or joints.
Several studies have suggested a link between passive smoking and meningococcal disease.
Scientists carried out a review of 18 studies.
The findings, published in BMC Public Health, show that exposure to second-hand smoke both in the home and womb significantly increases the risk of meningococcal disease.
Passive smoking in the home doubled the risk in children and raised it even further in the under-fives.
For children whose mothers smoked during pregnancy, the risk was three times higher than for children born into non-smoking households.
Study leader Dr Rachael Murray, from the UK Centre for Tobacco Studies at the University of Nottingham, said: "We estimate an extra 630 cases of childhood invasive meningococcal disease every year are directly attributable to second-hand smoke in the UK alone.
"While we cannot be sure exactly how tobacco smoke is affecting these children, the findings from this study highlight consistent evidence of the further harms of smoking around children and during pregnancy, and thus parents and family members should be encouraged to not smoke in the home or around children."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article