Smoking can almost double the risk of prostate cancer returning after surgery, a study has found.
Ex-smokers were also at greater risk of recurring cancer, but not those who quit the habit 10 years or more before having their prostate glands removed.
The findings, published in the journal European Urology, make it seem more likely that there is a link between smoking and prostate cancer.
Previous research has shown that smokers are more likely to die from the disease, but the results of other studies have been inconclusive.
The new investigation looked at data from 7,191 American and Austrian patients who had their prostate glands removed between 2000 and 2011.
Over a period of around 28 months, current smokers had an 80% increased likelihood of cancer returning after surgery than those who had never smoked.
Former smokers were 63% more at risk, but after 10 years free of tobacco their chances of having a cancer recurrence fell to the same level as those who had never smoked.
Lead scientist Professor Shahrokh Shariat, from the University Clinic of Urology at MedUni, Vienna, said: "Our study findings underline the importance of informing a prostate cancer patient about the negative effects of smoking.
"It is never too late to quit smoking. On the contrary, as our study shows, it makes sense to quit, even if you are already suffering from prostate cancer."
Patients whose cancer was known to have spread at the time of diagnosis were excluded from the study. None of the participants had received pre-operative radiotherapy, hormonal therapy or chemotherapy.
The jury is still out on links between smoking and prostate cancer. Some older studies have associated the habit with development of the disease while more recent research has indicated no connection.
"Many questions about prostate cancer and smoking are still unanswered," said Prof Shariat. "Further studies are therefore required to produce satisfactory answers."
Each year around 41,000 men in the UK are diagnosed with prostate cancer and around 11,000 die from the disease.
ends
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article