A BREAKTHROUGH discovery by Scots researchers could reveal why some people are more likely to die from flu than others.
A collaborative study by scientists at Edinburgh University's Roslin Institute and clinicians at NHS Lothian has shown people not protected by a certain gene are at risk of potentially life-threatening reactions to the viruses.
It is the first time researchers have identified a gene which determines our susceptibility and response to flu and other infections, and could pave the way for a screening regime to identify individuals who would benefit from vaccination.
Professor Tim Walsh, a consultant and professor of critical care medicine at Edinburgh University, said: "Flu can be devastating in the very young and elderly, but some previously fit young people can also develop life-threatening lung problems.
"Many young people required prolonged periods in intensive care during the swine flu pandemic and we had little idea why this small number of people was so severely affected. This study provides some clues as to why this may happen.
"It opens avenues for research to develop ways of predicting who might be at risk and where to focus efforts to find new treatments for severe viral infections."
The gene – known as IFITM3 – produces a protein that protects cells against infections. It is believed to be vital for kick-starting the immune system's battle against viruses such as swine flu. When present in large quantities, the protein hinders the spread of the flu virus in the lungs. However, people with the variant form of the gene cannot produce as much of this defence protein, thereby leading to a more severe bout of flu.
The study, published in the journal Nature, found patients who ended up in intensive care with potentially fatal complications after developing flu were much more likely to have a variant of this gene, which did not protect against the virus.
The study analysed DNA from patients treated in Scottish intensive care units during the 2009/10 swine flu pandemic. Blood samples were taken from the patients who had been previously fit and healthy.
While the variant is found in only 0.3% of the population, the scientists found it was present in 5.3% of patients in intensive care with flu – suggesting it plays a highly significant role in causing otherwise healthy individuals to fall seriously ill.
Dr Kenneth Baillie, of the Roslin Institute, said: "While most people who contract flu during a pandemic will recover well and not experience serious symptoms, some develop a catastrophic and potentially fatal illness and need to be treated in intensive care. This happens to otherwise healthy, young people.
"The answer as to why some people become seriously affected by flu and others don't was a mystery, but this study shows for the first time it may be because they are more genetically susceptible to the virus."
The study, launched after the swine flu pandemic arrived in Scotland in 2009, followed initial research on mice carried out at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute near Cambridge.
The Cambridge studies had already indicated mice with the rarer, mutant version of IFITM3 were much more likely to have severe symptoms than mice with the normal version. Now the Scottish research has shown a parallel relationship between flu and the human genome.
Professor Paul Kellam, a co-author on the paper and based at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, said: "This is important for people who have this variant as we predict their immune infections defences could be weakened to some virus infections.
"Ultimately, as we learn more about the genetics of susceptibility to viruses, these people can take informed precautions, such as vaccinations to prevent infection."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article