HEALTH Secretary Nicola Sturgeon has been accused of making a U-turn on doctors' bonuses after professionals earned nearly £22 million on top of their salaries last year.
Despite a Scottish Government promise to rein in a lucrative scheme, more than 800 consultants either entered the bonus system for the first time last year or scooped payments on a higher banding than they had previously.
Jackie Baillie, Labour's health spokeswoman, said Ms Sturgeon had "gone back on her word".
Distinction awards, which can give a consultant an annual pensionable top-up of between £31,959 and £75,889, cost the taxpayer £26m a year.
Discretionary points work on an eight-point sliding scale. A doctor who has one point gets a yearly top-up of around £3204, while a consultant with eight points gets more than £25,632 on top of their salary.
Points are awarded for an "above average" contribution.
An outcry over the bonuses prompted Ms Sturgeon to propose a freeze on the value of all awards and points in November 2010. She also called for a block on bonuses for new entrants and "no progression" through either scheme.
However, she has allowed the points system to remain almost untouched.
Ms Baillie said: "It is very disappointing that Nicola Sturgeon has gone back on her word at a time when our health service has lost 4500 staff."
A Scottish Government spokesman said: "We informed NHS boards that new discretionary points could be paid in 2011-12 for work done in 2010-11, and that remains the position for the next year."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article